Integrasi Platform E-Learning dan Coaching untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar Di Kabupaten Malang : Evaluasi Efektifitas dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap kualitas Pembelajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63200/jependimas.v2i4.58Keywords:
integrasi, e-learning, coaching, guru, kualitas, pembelajaranAbstract
Penelitian ini membahas integrasi platform e-learning dengan model coaching instruksional untuk guru Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Malang, serta evaluasi efektivitas dan pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas pembelajaran. Menggunakan desain kuasi-eksperimental dengan dua kelompok: (1) kelompok intervensi yang menerima paket integrasi LMS + coaching instruksional terjadwal selama 6 bulan (n = 60), dan (2) kelompok kontrol yang mengikuti pengembangan profesional konvensional (n = 60). Data mencakup instrumen kuantitatif (observasi kelas terstandar menggunakan rubrik kualitas pembelajaran, pre-post test kompetensi pedagogik) dan data kualitatif (wawancara guru, log aktivitas di platform, dan studi kasus sekolah). Analisis ANCOVA untuk menguji perbedaan efek intervensi, analisis tematik pada data kualitatif untuk menelaah mekanisme perubahan praktik mengajar. Hasilnya, integrasi platform e-learning dan coaching meningkatkan skor kualitas pembelajaran, signifikan dibanding kontrol (efek sedang, Δ > 0.30 SD; p < 0.05). Analisis kualitatif mengindikasikan peningkatan: (a) akses berkelanjutan ke modul mikro-pelatihan dan contoh praktik melalui LMS; (b) feedback terpersonalisasi dalam sesi coaching; dan (c) kultur kolaboratif yang didorong rekaman pembelajaran dan peer review, selaras dengan bukti coaching yang fokus pada praktik, dikombinasikan dukungan teknologi yang memfasilitasi refleksi, memperkuat transfer pembelajaran ke praktik kelas. Sehingga, kombinasi platform e-learning terstruktur dan coaching instruksional efektif meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di jenjang SD.
Downloads
References
Anderson, T. (2011). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). AU Press.
Aydin, C. H., & Tirkes, G. (2020). The role of learning management systems in teacher professional development. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 16(3), 45–59.
Cornett, J., & Knight, J. (2009). Research on coaching. In J. Knight (Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 192–216). Corwin Press.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development (Research Brief). Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., & Birman, B. F. (2020). Job-embedded professional development: What makes it effective? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720956265
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hug, T. (2017). Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development. Springer.
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(4), 22–30.
Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin Press.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Lofthouse, R. (2019). Coaching in education: A professional development process in formation. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.152961
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies (U.S. Department of Education). https://www.ed.gov/media/document/evaluation-of-evidence-based-practices-online-learning-meta-analysis-and-review-of-online-learning-studies-revised-september-2010-107159.pdf
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
OECD. (2022). Teachers and technology: The digital transition in education. OECD Publishing.
Parker, M., Patton, K., & Tannehill, D. (2012). Mapping the landscape of instructional coaching: The influence of professional development and teacher practice. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.548064
Puentedura, R. R. (2010). SAMR model: Transformation, technology, and education. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2015). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12137
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cucu Hayati; Sri Lestari, Diah Ayu Sanggarwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (CC BY 4.0). This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author for the original work.
